Cover I began reading the book Sacred Unions, Sacred Passions (2010) with an eye to find loopholes and practical problems in the author’s thesis. To say that his idea made me very cautious about endorsing this is a huge understatement. When I finished the book my personal copy was marked and annotated throughout. And almost every concern that I had was addressed in a way that I found quite satisfactory. This does not mean there are no practical problems in working out the thesis in everyday community but it does mean the thesis is itself worthy of the serious attention it just may not get from far too many Christians.

Let me begin by telling you that the author is a personal friend. Dan Brennan was once a part of the church family that I served as pastor for sixteen years. We have recently reconnected in a deep and personal way as older (hopefully much wiser) men. But I hasten to tell you that I do not endorse this book because my good friend wrote it. I endorse it because I believe it to be a book that is profoundly needed in the church if we are to become missional in the best and most profound sense of this word. I also believe this is a book that has answered some of my deepest questions about friendship, which is the real underlying theme of Brennan’s project. I have made friendship a primary goal of my life for years and have read a good deal on the subject in the process.

The subtitle sums up Brennan’s thesis very well. Cross-gender friendships are not only possible in our overly sexualized age but deeply important to the overall health of the body of Christ. How should brothers and sisters in Christ relate to one another in “the mystery of friendship” when almost everything that we’ve ever heard from respected leaders warns us about the dangers of close friendships with the opposite sex? We have a deeply ingrained instinctive fear of others that needs to be challenged if we are to proceed with care. Brennan is truly up to the task. He offers a way to think about authentic community that I’ve rarely encountered in current Christian literature. The way forward that he sets out is balanced, carefully researched and very well written. Scholar and ordinary leader alike can profit from this book.

Lilian Calles Barger, the author of another important book, Eve’s Revenge, says: “Dan Brennan provides a provocative path to rethinking our sexuality and cross-gender friendships. It may be that sex scandals and broken marriages among Christians is the result of a famine in cross-gender friendships.” Please read that statement again. Could the Freudian assumptions that remain normative to much of what we think about sex today, joined with conservative Christian teaching on romance and marriage, have fostered broken marriages? I believe so and I believe Dan Brennan makes a strong case for why this is the case.

Before I engage more directly in Brennan’s principal arguments I want to urge every reader to buy and read this book whether or not you agree with cross-gender relationships or not. (Practically, there is a lot of dialogue needed in the church about how such friendships should work. Where do we even begin this dialogue and how do we listen to one another? Brennan admits all of this, which is where the honest differences with him will undoubtedly come for some, myself included.) But unless, and until, we gain a solid grasp of the biblical, theological and historical literature about sacred friendship we are doomed to more prejudice and emotionalism regarding this provocative subject. Brennan understands this and carefully navigates a course of thought and response. If you start here, with a right view of sacred friendship, you will experience less emotional resistance to the more controversial issue of cross-gendered friendship. Such friendships are admittedly going to be an issue that will not be worked out easily in the present setting. If truth is known I think Brennan’s project will require incremental changes that will take a generation or more to bring about. My generation will likely die opposing what he says but the 20s and 30s who will someday lead the church are ready for this discussion if my guess is right. Personally, I want to be involved in the conversation  as a responsible Christian leader whether I can enter fully into the practice or not.

Dan’s wife Sheila writes the foreword. She says, “Methinks that friendship has fallen on hard times. When Facebook announces that a subscriber has ‘469 friends’ I have to wonder what ‘friend’ has come to mean in today’s parlance. While the concept of friendship has been expanded to such a degree that it has largely been diluted, the concept of intimacy has been narrowed to mean primarily sexual intimacy, and, within the Christian community, exclusively martial sexual intimacy.” I know Sheila and can attest that she deeply believes in Dan’s thesis and remains his very best critic and friend. She is herself a devoted wife and mother, a former college professor of mathematics and a most Christian.

Simply put, how can a married man and a single woman, to use but one controversial example, have a close friendship and remain chaste? Is such a relationship desirable, much less possible? Is it wise? This is where I would have responded negatively over the course of my six decades of life. You might get away with such a relationship, in some private context, but it is never, ever wise. Brennan has convinced me that this thinking is simply wrong. (I admit, again, that I have no idea how to proceed except by means of honest dialogue and learning.) The good news here is that he doesn’t tell me what precisely to do, in the sense of giving me a formula. Rather, he gives me nuanced answers so I can begin to make sense of a huge relational mine field. No married person should even begin to act on what the author says unless they can do it in a context of faith and love with their marriage partner. You must do nothing to harm your marriage, nothing. Love would have you respond no other way thus this is not a book to embrace and run off into the wild blue yonder.

The introduction begins with this paragraph, which sums up what the author is attempting to do rather succinctly:

What would our marriages, our friendships, our churches, and our communities look like if men and women were not afraid of connecting with each other in deep ways? What if men and women could really know each other without sex getting in the way? What if we did not have to be so afraid of our own and other’s bodies that we cannot trust ourselves with them?

I spent last week in the suburbs of Philadelphia. The hotel where I resided for six days was hosting a major conference for hundreds of employees of a large company. Men and women mixed freely, evidence of the great social changes of the last forty years. I thought, as I watched these people share drinks, food and laughter, “What a difficult challenge this brave new world presents to the Christian man and woman, especially if they travel away from home and mingle with each other so openly in public and private.” Then I thought about the implications of the sexual revolution I’ve lived through for six decades as I watched men and women relate to each other in this convivial context. I am sure a few marriages were being destroyed right before my eyes. But then I asked, “What is a Christian man or woman to do in a context like this?” My pat answers were challenged afresh as I pondered Brennan’s provocative book throughout the week. In general, I believe he says that any connecting in this particular social setting must be done very, very carefully. Remember, remaining chaste is plainly at the heart of his thesis. But if Christ’s perfect love casts out fear then there is no room for sexual stereotypes that should keep us from genuinely loving our neighbors, both male and female. The problem, as anyone with any experience knows, is how do you actually do this and remain committed to biblical chastity and fidelity?

You can engage with Dan Brennan’s book and thoughts on his excellent book blog site. I encourage you to check out what he has to say. I will engage his arguments further over the next several days.

Tomorrow: Sacred Sexuality and Friendship

Related Posts

Comments

  1. Jennifer December 21, 2010 at 6:54 am

    This is such an important topic and I’m so glad to see it discussed.
    I think all of the rules of the past (Christian men and women shouldn’t have dinner together alone, or shouldnt ride in a car alone, or …) were helpful in their context, but I’m glad that the larger Christian community can begin to wrestle with that kind of thinking and see that it might be time for moving past mere rules. I’ve read this book too and think its something that can guide some much-needed converstaion.
    Thanks for doing this post, John. I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts on what is to come!

  2. Sheila December 21, 2010 at 6:59 am

    Wow – thank you, John! You “get” it: “I believe it to be a book that is profoundly needed in the church if we are to become missional in the best and most profound sense of this word. I also believe this is a book that has answered some of my deepest questions about friendship, which is the real underlying theme of Brennan’s project.”
    Yes, it is. And I still believe friendship has been seriously eviscerated in much Christian thought, seen as an occasional luxury along the road (like an iphone?) but hardly necessary – much less central – to Kingdom living.
    I, too, “have made friendship a primary goal of my life” more so now that I am in a season that allows me opportunity to make such an investment.
    In the words of Rainer Maria Rilke, “For one human being to love another: that is perhaps the most difficult of all our tasks, the last test and proof, the work for which all other work is but preparation.” Sacred friendship is the venue wherein we learn the dance of deeply loving, the sacred space wherein we encounter “God with us.”

  3. kathyescobar December 21, 2010 at 10:04 am

    thanks for this thoughtful response. i really think that dan’s challenge to us is one we need to continue to consider. i am in a community where these cross-gender friendships are being lived out and restoration and healing is happening in all kinds of ways. at the same time, it’s not easy to do or something to take lightly. i think living them out in community is what makes a difference, where others can speak into and encourage and be part of the relationships, too. i can say in my own life i am so thankful for the healing and strengthening that has come from learning how to do friendship with men well. it’s so possible. and when i am alongside my brothers in equal, loving, relationship it feels like this is what real community is supposed to look like. i really appreciate dan’s voice and am glad it’s getting into many hands out here so that the Body can be challenged. peace to you in the work that you do.

  4. Jim Henderson December 21, 2010 at 11:23 am

    John
    I respect and admire your courage to not play this both ways.
    You clearly acknowledge your practical problems with trying to apply Dans thesis (many of which reflect my own) but you did not throw him under the theological bus (which is what theologians trying to cover their … often do)
    Thank you for being an honest and heartfelt follower of Jesus

  5. Dana Ames December 21, 2010 at 11:43 am

    Friendship, faithfulness and chastity are so exquisitely and profoundly human, and that is exactly what makes all of them sacred and is the “glue” that holds them together. Part of the problem with how people see Christianity is that we have spiritualized so much of the reality of life, as if it were some different kind of category of “good” than the rest of the good around us.
    In addition, the expectation is rampant that virtue is supposed to just magically happen since one is a Christian, and I see this as “the other side of the coin” of the unwillingness of Christians to approach this subject. Everything worthwhile is difficult, especially becoming human – even in the wake of the Resurrection. Sure, the difficulty is there – and it stops some of us way too easily.
    God created us to be fully human, not to bracket off certain parts of our humanity from other parts out of fear. Mature, full love casts out fear. Since we are constituted as humans in relationship with other human Persons (prosopon – from the Greek that means “face to face”), how in the world are we going to come to fullness of love without faithful friends? And if we’re walking in that love even just a smidgen, we have the incredible honor and responsibility of loving others to life. It’s that big a deal.
    Thank God for Dan’s -and Sheila’s- faithfulness in living this, as well as energy and perseverence in writing about it. Thank God that people in our day are hearing and responding to the call to become fully human in Christ.
    Dana

  6. Beth December 22, 2010 at 8:38 am

    Thanks for this wonderful post. I, too, appreciate your balanced treatment of this difficult topic. The emotional responses and fear it stirs, along with the significant practical implications make it hard for many to want to take it on. I think you may be correct that real change will be slow. Obviously, it is not an easy task to confront such deeply entrenched cultural ideals. But…many of us are committed to figuring this out in our communities and appreciate another voice in the conversation!

  7. George C December 24, 2010 at 10:05 am

    Thanks for posting this, John.
    I often feel that deep friendships, even between people of the same gender, are not really encouraged in the church. The unbiblical myth that Jesus is enough to satify us fully (in some sort of vacuum, apart from means) turns many friendships into nothing more than utilitarian exchanges.
    The mindset behind this has much more to do with american culture and ideals than the exhortations of scripture and the legitimate yearnings of the human heart to know and be known.

Comments are closed.

My Latest Book!

order here

Use Promo code UNITY for 40% discount!

Recent Articles

Search

Archive