My question will likely startle some. It seems obvious to others. Count me among the latter group. I have read the book many, many times but it has never seemed clearly apparent to me that it belongs, even among the books that we call the “wisdom literature.”
I recently read Ecclesiastes again, this time in The Message. Same question: Why is it here? How does it belong?
The writer undertakes an investigation of experience at all levels. He asks questions about creation, justice, the wise versus the foolish, and the just versus the unjust. He insists that though God is sovereign over all things we cannot know exactly what God is doing or why he is doing it. What then is our proper human response? To take what we get now and use it as best we can. (Here is the observation that I wish I had learned much sooner! I tried to connect the dots of providence in my life overmuch and quite often I did so way too simplistically.)
So when various theologians and preachers tell you how God is directing events read this book. It is impossible to know when or how God is ruling over our lives and changing history in our little moment in time. Simply put: it is always a dangerous and problematic thing to become an interpreter of providence. (The Puritans prove my point!!!) The writer (Qoheleth) says “Here is what I understand as good: it is well if a person eat, drink, and enjoy all the fruits of one’s life, for this is a person’s lot” (Ecclesiastes 5:17). Everything has a proper time. There is a “time to be born and a time to die . . . a time to weep and a time to laugh” (3:2-3). But the “why” and the precise “when” are known only to God. The advice of Qoheleth is simple: “Fear God” (5:6).
The historical fact is that the Jewish rabbis fought for a long time over whether to include Ecclesiastes in the canon of the Bible. Most agree that its ultimate inclusion happened because it was attributed to Solomon. (An editor seems to have added a pious conclusion in Ecclesiastes 12:9-14.) This message at the end can be summed up by this statement: “Fear God and keep his commandments” (12:13).
I believe it is fortunate that the rabbis included this book in the Bible. Why? (I’ll not give you a pious, highly technical defense of canonicity and biblical authority, though I certainly have a high view of the Bible!)
This book teaches something we desperately need today as much as ever. There is a great gulf between the transcendent God and our human striving to understand and to control affairs. (I remind myself of this as I watch another election cycle unfold and fear the worst outcomes.) We want to determine the best course of action for out times and we believe that we must have some say in it. We kid ourselves. We think that if we do things just so then everything will turn out well (or at least better) because: “It really is a wonderful life.” But this is false piety. True piety trusts God even when things are seemingly meaningless. True piety leads us to surrender to God’s loving care even when we have no idea where it will lead. We all know this instinctively but Qoheleth makes it abundantly plain in Ecclesiastes!
My Latest Book!
Use Promo code UNITY for 40% discount!
Should Ecclesiastes Be in the Biblical Canon?: My question will likely startle some. It seems obvious to others…. https://t.co/nRt4oUEGee
Richard Roland liked this on Facebook.
Andy Gerhart liked this on Facebook.
I LOVE the book of Ecclesiastes
I’ve taught and preached through it
Qoheleth asks all sorts of questions and honestly wrestles with life in his quest for meaning
Life is short – vapor, really. How do you hold on to it? The key question is if life is lived apart from God or under God.
The dark times, the happy times, times that make you scratch your head – they all come. Someone said Proverbs builds the house; Ecclesiastes knocks it down. Keep holding on through whatever may come. It’s not easy to understand why things happen.
I’m not qualified to answer your question, John H. Armstrong, but I’m sure glad it’s there.
Good word Dan Olson about Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. It is interesting how little God is actually named in Proverbs. Much of what is there works for non-believers. So does Ecclesiastes except we are not cynics or skeptics.
Excellent post, John. Amen!
Nice post John. I think back in 2013 I preached 26 messages on Ecclesiastes….toughest thing I ever did, but also the most rewarding….and my church loved it. One of our favorite words/expressions now at Grace (besides, “We don’t HAVE to, we GET to”) is ‘hevel/hebel’, which we use to identify that stuff in life that happens and appears to be meaningless or vain or empty, but has as of yet to be explained by the Author of the Story.
Randy Evans liked this on Facebook.
Daniel McDonald liked this on Facebook.
Clay Knick liked this on Facebook.
Steve Stasinos liked this on Facebook.
Ray Prigodich liked this on Facebook.
Garry Trammell liked this on Facebook.
Monte E Wilson liked this on Facebook.
“True piety trusts God even when things are seemingly meaningless.”
RT @JohnA1949: Should Ecclesiastes Be in the Biblical Canon?: My question will likely startle some. It seems obvious to others…. https://…
Bill Meinel liked this on Facebook.
.@JohnA1949 asks (and answers), Should Ecclesiastes Be in the Biblical Canon? https://t.co/nqy5seSOx5 https://t.co/QxIP7pCnPE
Jeb Gaither liked this on Facebook.
Adam Ross liked this on Facebook.
Greg Metzger liked this on Facebook.
Peter Enns has a very nice half chapter about Ecclesiastes in his latest book The Sin of Certainty, and he draws similar conclusions.
Thanks Joseph L Schafer and all.
As a former Evangelical, now Process person, I don’t use “canon” as fully determinative of authority or “fittingness” of a given piece of Jewish or early Christian literature. (Canon is too wrapped up with human judgment, just as is the edited contents of its books, to decipher what God supposedly intended to be included vs. what left out.) None-the-less, I’m also glad it’s included. It’s more typical of the ancient/modern Jewish approach than of the Christian – raw, deep human emotion and mental struggling, similar to many of the Psalms. It appears to me that Jewish sages were more willing than we modern Christians like to accept, to express a wide variety of theologies and to include the “negative” side of deep doubt, pain, and questioning. When many, out of desire to shore up faith and/or protect orthodoxy, treat others’ doubts superficially or with simplistic answers, the results are often very damaging. Many “lose faith” and never return, even to a “Golden Mean” kind of faith (as I see Process), let alone full orthodoxy.