
Cathy opened his first restaurant in an Atlanta suburb in 1946. His boneless chicken sandwich would propel the franchise to more than 1,800 outlets in 39 states. By 2013 the company said that its annual sales topped $5 billion. The company is family-owned thus it is the Cathy family who seem poised to continue to hold to the core values that their father promoted. Cathy’s personal fortune is said to have been in excess of $6 billion, putting him annually on the Forbes magazine list of the wealthiest Americans. The company listed him as chairman emeritus on its website since he had left day-to-day operations to the younger leaders in the family some years ago.
Unlike Ian Paisley, who I wrote about yesterday, S. Truett Cathy never publicly altered his stance on several “hot-button” issues. This was especially true with regard to the same-sex marriage debate which he actively spoke about. But what the press often failed to notice was how much the company had changed its tone and direction under the influence of his sons.
Dan Cathy, the chief operating officer of the company, got involved in a much-ballyhooed controversy about same-sex marriage in 2012. This controversy, which spilled over into political contexts such as the Chicago City Council. Some members of the council sought to stop the chain from opening a restaurant in the city. Related stories about the company were still making news even last week in California.
The larger controversy about Chick-fil-A, and same-sex marriage debate in particular, has slowly died down. But the virtually uncovered story over the last few years was sadly missed by most outlets when a leading LGBT spokesman was invited to spend personal time with Dan Cathy in 2013. Thankfully, this story was reported by the Huffington Post. The video is well worth seeing.
I get the sense that the younger Cathy leaders are committed to approaching this controversial issue with a different approach even if their views (morally and politically) remain the same as those of their father. To some extent this shift is similar to the wide-scale generational movement that we are seeing among many Christians who are growing weary of this being “the” political hot-button issue that creates the biggest hill to die on in the culture.
As I look at this hugely contentious issue among Christians I am reminded that for us, and for our churches, this issue really has three major components: (1) Political, (2) Pastoral, and (3) Missional.





The pope is seeking to show us a far better way to engage with a world that starves to hear good news, not ecclesial judgment.
I heard Ian Paisley many times in my one year at Bob Jones University. Quite a character. He was always loud, and saw everything as black and white, using very derogatory language for those who lacked the courage of conviction.
I have to laugh at Bruce’s comment, because the Bob Jones alums keep popping up on my radar. And, a few them, are changing their tune of Catholicism. It’s an amazing day in the end times fulfillment.
Mark Sisson liked this on Facebook.
Bonnie Maguire Brown liked this on Facebook.
John Byung Lee liked this on Facebook.
Clay Knick liked this on Facebook.
Brent Orrell liked this on Facebook.
Joseph L Schafer liked this on Facebook.
Sharon Schafer liked this on Facebook.
Ben Toh liked this on Facebook.
Donnie Freeman liked this on Facebook.
Albert Anthony Cota liked this on Facebook.
Rick Landry liked this on Facebook.
David A. Wheat liked this on Facebook.