Must the Reformation Wars Continue? (Sixteen)

Unknown-1Could it really be true that Rome misunderstood the Reformers teaching on grace and faith in what they wrote at the Council of Trent?

One evangelical respondent to the blog that sparked my initial interest in preparing this series of posts put the common view of so many quite well: “What is needed from the Catholic Church is repentance so shouldn’t the Church formally renounce what it said at Trent?”

Isn’t this really the bottom line? Shouldn’t the Catholic Church “repent” or we cannot trust a single thing that they now say about justification and the gospel?

The answer of many anti-Catholic apologists to this question is very simple. They say something like this: “The Catholic Church cannot change by its own confession about itself never changing so whatever they now say has no bearing on the fundamental issue of justification unless they recant, repent and remove the teaching of the Council of Trent on this central issue.”

My first response to this is to ask you another question: “What church removes the past and unconfesses what it once strongly confessed?” And, “What would the Catholic Church do, given how it develops dogma and reflects upon its own teaching by new dogmatic ways of expression, to make you actually believe that it really does teach salvation by grace through faith?”

A theologian once used an illustration with me that compared this matter to “blue laws” in America’s legal history. They are still on the books but the present circumstances and legal opinions clearly override them in a way that reconsiders these laws and, in some cases, makes them of less importance to the present situation in history. This illustration may help but it doesn’t quite go far enough. The Joint Declaration says what happened far better than this approach can put it.

So what does The Joint Declaration actually say?

This declaration is shaped by the conviction that in their respective histories our churches have come to new insights. [Remember, this is an official church agreement between the Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation.] Developments have taken place which not only make possible, but also require the churches to examine the divisive questions and condemnations and see them in a new light.

That is clear and staggering if you take it seriously. Only a person on the outside, willingly hoping that this was not what they said or meant, could miss this. Here is section 2 of the same document:

By appropriating insights of recent biblical studies and drawing on modern investigations of the history of theology and dogma, the post-Vatican II ecumenical dialogue has led to a notable convergence concerning justification, with the result that this Joint Declaration is able to formulate a consensus on basic truths concerning the doctrine of justification. In light of this consensus, the corresponding doctrinal condemnations of the sixteenth century do not apply to today’s partner.

In section 27 we read this from the Catholic contributors:

The Catholic understanding also sees faith as fundamental in justification. For without faith, no justification can take place. Persons are justified through baptism as hearers of the word and believers in it. The justification of sinners is forgiveness of sins and being made righteous by justifying grace, which makes us children of God. In justification the righteous receive from Christ faith, hope, and love and are thereby taken into communion with him.[14] This new personal relation to God is grounded totally on God’s graciousness and remains constantly dependent on the salvific and creative working of this gracious God, who remains true to himself, so that one can rely upon him. Thus justifying grace never becomes a human possession to which one could appeal over against God. While Catholic teaching emphasizes the renewal of life by justifying grace, this renewal in faith, hope, and love is always dependent on God’s unfathomable grace and contributes nothing to justification about which one could boast before God (Rom 3:27). [See Sources for section 4.3].

26 Comments on “Must the Reformation Wars Continue? (Sixteen)”

  1. John The understanding on blue laws is clearly wide spread.
    Other than what I have learned from you ,I had no idea that the position of the Catholic church had changed.
    My perception is that a very small percentage of the Evangelical population understands this shift.
    You are doing your part.
    What is the Catholic church doing to widely communicate on this issue?

  2. Hi Everyone,
    People ought to read Hans Kung’s dissertation on justification which shows a gross misunderstanding between Catholics and Protestants. Like I said before, unless someone believes in salvation without Jesus Lordship or a cheap easy believism, Trent probably does not apply to you. I was at a Baptist Bible study just recently where one lady joked that maybe Pope Francis was the Anti-Christ. I think the poor attitudes and misunderstandings weigh more heavily among Protestants. Its time for the church to grow up. We are our own worst enemies.

    1. Really good counsel my friend. Thanks for the excellent reminder of how we speak and do not speak well in these misunderstood conflicts.

  3. Agreed John. We need to find new ways to where we find common ground. For people who like to stir up old debates, all one has to do is for both sides to bring up the polemics and name calling of the seventeenth and eighteenth century for example for the conversation to turn ugly. Maybe not all of us but I would like to believe most of us are past all that . . .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *