In my post yesterday I referenced the response of some conservative Christian ministers and leaders to the Supreme Court ruling on marriage announced last week. A Chicago news report noted that Archbishop Blasé J. Cupich, on Sunday, July 5, urged Chicago’s Catholics to adopt “mature and serene reflections as we move forward together.” Cupich noted that the Court’s decision had “redefined civil marriage.” He also said that the Catholic Church has “an abiding concern for the dignity of gay persons.” But, he added, “It is also important to stress that the Supreme Court’s redefinition of civil marriage has no bearing on the Catholic Sacrament of Matrimony in which the marriage of man and woman is a sign of the union of Christ and the Church. In upholding our traditional concept of marriage, we are called to support those who have entered into this sacred and loving bond with God and each other.”
Can you not see the striking difference in both wording and tone in the archbishop’s response and that of stridently conservative evangelicals and Catholics in other parts of America? I believe that every word he spoke must be weighed with great care. I feel sure that he crafted them with this intent. He is saying:
1. The church has not redefined marriage thus this recent action is a civil one, not an ecclesial one. (The Catholic Church is not going to be swayed in its understanding of marriage by culture!)
2. The Catholic Church is not going to launch an all-out war against those who enter into such a civil marriage but these marriages are not sacramental and thus not defined as Christian marriages.
3. We should love gay people and civilly married couples and we must protect their dignity as fellow citizens and neighbors.
4. Finally, we need to engage in “mature and serene reflections as we move forward together.” This, to me, is his way of saying we the Catholic Church does not plan on using the tactics of cultural warfare. The church is here to minister to people, not to drive them away. At the same time he is saying that our view of marriage is unchanging as a church.
To draw out this fourth point I will quote from Archbishop Cupich.
This will be especially important for the members of our own Church as we walk together, respectful not only of the political demands of equality, but above all else, guided by the higher claims of divine revelation. Our aim in all of this will be to hold fast to an authentic understanding of marriage which has been written in the human heart, consolidated in history, and confirmed by the Word of God.
I believe that Archbishop Cupich has spoken well. He has maintained the church’s understanding of marriage as God’s sacrament, not as a civil arrangement decided by the courts. At the same time he has clearly affirmed human dignity and Christian love for all our neighbors. He has also urged his fellow Christians who disagree with the church to love one another. And, finally, he has plainly taught his flock how to do all of this in a most gentle and Christ-like way. I cannot do better. Thank you archbishop.
Related Posts
Comments
My Latest Book!
Use Promo code UNITY for 40% discount!
Chicago’s Archbishop Cupich’s Response to the Supreme Court’s Ruling: In my post yesterday I referenced the… http://t.co/MMys5EopNX
Joseph L Schafer liked this on Facebook.
Rick Landry liked this on Facebook.
Erik Chaffer liked this on Facebook.
Adam Shields liked this on Facebook.
Daniel McDonald liked this on Facebook.
David A. Weed liked this on Facebook.
Edmund Conroy liked this on Facebook.
Brandon Fang liked this on Facebook.
Bryan Prosser liked this on Facebook.
Eric Gibson liked this on Facebook.
Wally Johnson liked this on Facebook.
Donald J Cummings liked this on Facebook.
Johanna Lee Nett liked this on Facebook.
Historicly marriage licensing in the US started to control (stop) interracial marriage (Bill Luck told me about this )
Steve Rhodes liked this on Facebook.
Randy Blunt liked this on Facebook.
Natalie Tu liked this on Facebook.
Grace Church of Dunedin liked this on Facebook.
David Rhoads liked this on Facebook.
Barry Bruce liked this on Facebook.
Leszek Bober liked this on Facebook.
Wayne McAllester liked this on Facebook.
Will the Archbishop take part in the marriage of same sex couples?
No priest or bishop could officiate a same-sex marriage. The law they serve under will not permit and (more than likely) never will, at least in our collective lefties. Only a small % of Catholics want this to change and no bishop proposes it so far as I know.
No, no priest or bishop could perform a same-sex union. Catholic ecclesial law forbids it. There is little serious attempt to change it and though I am not a prophet I do not see anything that would/could alter it. The same goes for the Orthodox Church. Only Protestant churches, and then only a few older ones, have made this change. The U.S. Methodists are the next larger group to fight this battle in public and where change is coming or will likely come. Time will tell.
Michael Pruitt liked this on Facebook.
This is correct. The Supreme Court ended all laws against inter-racial marriage some decades ago.
Nick Morgan liked this on Facebook.
Marvelous wisdom, and such a breath of fresh air, John!
He is absolutely right. But we must understand as Protestants, atheists, divorced people and many others we are not “married” either which entirely up to the church to decide for itself. It is a sacrament not a license! Now let us all get about the business of finding ways to invite each other to come to a common table and to see and experience the Risen Christ in the breaking of the bread.
Dave Lescalleet liked this on Facebook.
Garry Trammell liked this on Facebook.
Is your understanding of Christian marriage sacramental? If so, do you take this as meaning that (1) Christian marriage is a means by which we share in grace, or that (2) Christian marriage is a sign of (pointer to) God’s redemptive activity, or something else? My (rough and ready) understanding is that Catholics tend toward (1) while Protestants at best incline to (2), and that these are significantly different. So I’m wondering whether the way we understand “sacrament” here is going to affect whether or not this line will be helpful, especially to Protestants.
Andy, I lean toward #2 but not strongly. I see truth in #1 as well. Protestants, in reaction in the 16th century, did not want to make anything a sacrament unless it was instituted directly by Jesus, thus only Eucharist and Baptism. I believe Jesus blessed marriage, given at creation, with a unique blessing and presence that makes it a gift for the church to give to those who wed in grace, thus it is sacramental.